Utah Looks to Online Gambling Ban Whilst Tribal Intranet Gambling Begins
Thursday, March 1st, 2012
America is currently in the midst of turmoil when it comes to online gambling, with just as many states wanting to ban the gambling pastime as those who want to legalize it. As Utah and Washington officials see rising support against allowing online gambling to come to their states, it has been revealed that a US tribal casinos network could be established to link Native American groups from 28 American states.
Atlantic Internet Group Corp (ATIG) Announce Tribal Intranet Gaming
Nevada based ATIG have revealed that they have launched an intranet gaming network within some of their tribal casinos. In what is believed to be the first instance of legal intranet gambling in North America, the Louisiana based Coushatta Indian Casino and the California located Coyote Valley Casino have signed agreements with ATIG for joining the network.
Tribal Gaming Network History
First founded in 2009, the Tribal Gaming Network was allowed to go ahead after the National Indian Gaming Commission authorized operations to go ahead. The gaming network itself offers a wide variety of games after ATIG worked alongside some of the leading online gaming suppliers to offer a range of online, Class III and Class II titles. This means that those using the network can access online live dealer games, simulated sports betting, virtual horse racing, slot titles, table games and nationwide poker. In addition, the Tribal Gaming Network is only the second provider to offer gamers access to a Lotto product using a Powerball theme.
Tribal Gaming Falls Outside of Online Gambling Regulations
Strictly speaking, the Tribal Gaming Network falls outside of regular online gambling regulations because, in order to access the network, players must actually be physically present in a casino which is connected to the intranet. Once players are within a casino, they can access ATIG’s gaming platform in a number of ways, including via kiosks, slot machines, Samsung Tablets and Android mobile phones. A few of the network’s games can even be played on Apple’s iPhone. This means of access has been described by ATIG as a casino within a casino, and the company has said that it could offer a prosperous future in server-based gambling.
ATIG Leads the Move towards Legitimate Online Gambling
Alongside ATIG, many casino companies have been preparing for online gambling legislation for a number of years, producing play-for-free and play-for-fun websites which could be turned into real money websites in the future. ATIG has been producing such websites since 2003 and is now said to be the leader in the march towards online gambling. The Tribal Gaming Network, whilst operating on an intranet, allows for real money wagering on all titles and games apart from bingo, and could be seen as a crucial company for others to reflect upon online gambling success.
Utah Look to Ban Online Gaming
click here to see most Popular PagesHowever, whilst the Tribal Gaming Network has managed to exploit a loophole in online gambling, many American states continue to see conflict between those who want to allow the online enterprise and those who want to stop it from occurring entirely. The latter opinion is the case in Utah, where Republican Representative Stephen Sandstrom is seeking a total ban on online gambling even if future federal laws allow it. His latest bill, HB108, was held to a vote on February 21st, 2012, with 61 in favor and 9 who were opposed. With the bill now passed in the House, it will go for Senate approval and, if being passed at this higher level, could ban online gambling within the state indefinitely, even if national legislation comes into force at a later time.
HB108’s Opt-out Clause
Many of the opponents against the HB108 bill being passed argued that because federal legislation will have to include an opt-out clause, there would be no need for such an individual Utah bill. However, USA Congress running candidate Sandstrom countered the attack by saying that opt-out clauses normally had a 60 day period, after which time the moment to decide against national legislation would be missed. With unforeseen delays possibly acting upon the opt-out opportunity, his HB108 bill would safeguard against a situation where legalized online gambling could come to the state of Utah by default. If the bill is passed by the Senate, Washington DC will be immediately informed that Utah will play no part in future online gambling even if federal approval is made. And, with the region already banning all forms of gambling under its state constitution, it is likely that the Senate will pass the upcoming bill.
Iowa Faces Public and Official Dispute
Whilst Utah may see its officials campaigning against online gambling, the opposite is true in Iowa where it has been found that it is members of the public who are not in favor of legalizing the online enterprise. On February 20th, 2012, lawmakers in the state passed a bill at Senate sub-committee level, providing the foundations for online poker websites to be established that would be regulated in the same fashion as casinos based in bricks and mortar venues. However, a poll of 800 adult residents in the state of Iowa discovered that 69per cent of people don’t actually want online gambling to be given the go ahead; a very similar figure to a survey taken in February 2011 which showed that 73per cent of citizens were against online gambling legislation. Meanwhile, 28per cent said that they were in favor, whilst 3per cent said that they were undecided.
Second Thoughts for Washington’s Councilor Brown
Finally, in Washington DC, it has been revealed that Councilor Michael A. Brown seems to be showing uncertainly regarding trying to bring about another bill to allow online gambling. A bill has already been passed on the issue which was then later repealed after officials said that it had managed to sneak through by default. Whilst Brown was one of the lead officials in getting this bill passed, it has now been reported that he feels Congress will bring fresh attempts to block an online gambling bill should he create one, leading to many believing that Washington DC too will not allow online gambling to occur in the near future.



